For millennia, cultural heritage pieces taken away from their original owners and given to new ones in a manner similar to looting or plunder have existed and, therefore, the subject has been studied by multiple experts from numerous perspectives. It is quite different, however, to study the more nuanced topic of cultural heritage misplacement within one single community and that is what this paper does: explore the repercussions that the non-return of cultural heritage taken away during the Civil War and subsequent dictatorship has on the democratic and social levels in the context of 2023 Spain.
Previous research showed that experts have focused on the politics, cultural policy and misappropriation, but few have tried to blend them together in one study. Nevertheless, there was a clear gap in the literature regarding the approaches adopted thus far as no researchers had combined the different disciplines interacting with cultural heritage such as political science or sociology. This paper aimed at creating a supportive argument for pre-existing investigations such as Arturo Colorado Castellary's on the ongoing situation of non-returned pieces of Spanish cultural heritage by studying the democratic and social implications of the non-return in present day.
The analytical part of the study was done through a content analysis methodology where the performed coding on the collected datainterviews, tweets, legislative papers and academic journalsrevealed the reappearance of certain words and topics, exposing a democratic system still linked to the past fascist dictatorship from the 20th century in Spain both in terms of legislation and social perception. These findings acquired a considerable significance on the research field because no previous study on Spanish cultural heritage had focused particularly on the social level or its connection to democraticness.
Anotace v angličtině
For millennia, cultural heritage pieces taken away from their original owners and given to new ones in a manner similar to looting or plunder have existed and, therefore, the subject has been studied by multiple experts from numerous perspectives. It is quite different, however, to study the more nuanced topic of cultural heritage misplacement within one single community and that is what this paper does: explore the repercussions that the non-return of cultural heritage taken away during the Civil War and subsequent dictatorship has on the democratic and social levels in the context of 2023 Spain.
Previous research showed that experts have focused on the politics, cultural policy and misappropriation, but few have tried to blend them together in one study. Nevertheless, there was a clear gap in the literature regarding the approaches adopted thus far as no researchers had combined the different disciplines interacting with cultural heritage such as political science or sociology. This paper aimed at creating a supportive argument for pre-existing investigations such as Arturo Colorado Castellary's on the ongoing situation of non-returned pieces of Spanish cultural heritage by studying the democratic and social implications of the non-return in present day.
The analytical part of the study was done through a content analysis methodology where the performed coding on the collected datainterviews, tweets, legislative papers and academic journalsrevealed the reappearance of certain words and topics, exposing a democratic system still linked to the past fascist dictatorship from the 20th century in Spain both in terms of legislation and social perception. These findings acquired a considerable significance on the research field because no previous study on Spanish cultural heritage had focused particularly on the social level or its connection to democraticness.
Klíčová slova
cultural heritage, Spain, misplacement, Francoism, democraticness, social repercussions
Klíčová slova v angličtině
cultural heritage, Spain, misplacement, Francoism, democraticness, social repercussions
Rozsah průvodní práce
61 p. (136.076 cts), xxvi app.
Jazyk
AN
Anotace
For millennia, cultural heritage pieces taken away from their original owners and given to new ones in a manner similar to looting or plunder have existed and, therefore, the subject has been studied by multiple experts from numerous perspectives. It is quite different, however, to study the more nuanced topic of cultural heritage misplacement within one single community and that is what this paper does: explore the repercussions that the non-return of cultural heritage taken away during the Civil War and subsequent dictatorship has on the democratic and social levels in the context of 2023 Spain.
Previous research showed that experts have focused on the politics, cultural policy and misappropriation, but few have tried to blend them together in one study. Nevertheless, there was a clear gap in the literature regarding the approaches adopted thus far as no researchers had combined the different disciplines interacting with cultural heritage such as political science or sociology. This paper aimed at creating a supportive argument for pre-existing investigations such as Arturo Colorado Castellary's on the ongoing situation of non-returned pieces of Spanish cultural heritage by studying the democratic and social implications of the non-return in present day.
The analytical part of the study was done through a content analysis methodology where the performed coding on the collected datainterviews, tweets, legislative papers and academic journalsrevealed the reappearance of certain words and topics, exposing a democratic system still linked to the past fascist dictatorship from the 20th century in Spain both in terms of legislation and social perception. These findings acquired a considerable significance on the research field because no previous study on Spanish cultural heritage had focused particularly on the social level or its connection to democraticness.
Anotace v angličtině
For millennia, cultural heritage pieces taken away from their original owners and given to new ones in a manner similar to looting or plunder have existed and, therefore, the subject has been studied by multiple experts from numerous perspectives. It is quite different, however, to study the more nuanced topic of cultural heritage misplacement within one single community and that is what this paper does: explore the repercussions that the non-return of cultural heritage taken away during the Civil War and subsequent dictatorship has on the democratic and social levels in the context of 2023 Spain.
Previous research showed that experts have focused on the politics, cultural policy and misappropriation, but few have tried to blend them together in one study. Nevertheless, there was a clear gap in the literature regarding the approaches adopted thus far as no researchers had combined the different disciplines interacting with cultural heritage such as political science or sociology. This paper aimed at creating a supportive argument for pre-existing investigations such as Arturo Colorado Castellary's on the ongoing situation of non-returned pieces of Spanish cultural heritage by studying the democratic and social implications of the non-return in present day.
The analytical part of the study was done through a content analysis methodology where the performed coding on the collected datainterviews, tweets, legislative papers and academic journalsrevealed the reappearance of certain words and topics, exposing a democratic system still linked to the past fascist dictatorship from the 20th century in Spain both in terms of legislation and social perception. These findings acquired a considerable significance on the research field because no previous study on Spanish cultural heritage had focused particularly on the social level or its connection to democraticness.
Klíčová slova
cultural heritage, Spain, misplacement, Francoism, democraticness, social repercussions
Klíčová slova v angličtině
cultural heritage, Spain, misplacement, Francoism, democraticness, social repercussions
Zásady pro vypracování
The MA thesis is worth 30 ECTS: 5 ECTS for the (initial) research and preparation – to be handed in as a "thesis portfolio/outline” (deadline: 1 December, 3rd semester) – and 25 ECTS for the writing process and final product. The MA thesis should be written in proper, academic English, consistently using one variant (e.g., UK, US or Canadian) only. The thesis should count between 20.000 and 30.000 words - including footnotes but excluding the title page, declaration sheet, table of contents abstract, preface, bibliography, and annexes (if applicable). The spacing between the lines should be set at 1,5. Students should mention the number of words on the abstract page of their thesis. In the case of deviation of the prescribed number of words a student should motivate the deviation (explain why less or more words) and next the deviation should be approved by both supervisors AND both directors of studies.
Zásady pro vypracování
The MA thesis is worth 30 ECTS: 5 ECTS for the (initial) research and preparation – to be handed in as a "thesis portfolio/outline” (deadline: 1 December, 3rd semester) – and 25 ECTS for the writing process and final product. The MA thesis should be written in proper, academic English, consistently using one variant (e.g., UK, US or Canadian) only. The thesis should count between 20.000 and 30.000 words - including footnotes but excluding the title page, declaration sheet, table of contents abstract, preface, bibliography, and annexes (if applicable). The spacing between the lines should be set at 1,5. Students should mention the number of words on the abstract page of their thesis. In the case of deviation of the prescribed number of words a student should motivate the deviation (explain why less or more words) and next the deviation should be approved by both supervisors AND both directors of studies.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Alted Vigil, Alicia. Política Del Nuevo Estado Sobre El Patrimonio Cultural y La Educación Durante La Guerra Civil Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, Centro Nacional de Información Artística, Arqueológica y Etnológica, 1984.
Álvarez Lopera, José. La Política De Bienes Culturales Del Gobierno Republicano Durante La Guerra Civil Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte, 1982.
Colorado Castellary, Arturo. Arte, Botín De Guerra. Madrid: Ed. Cátedra, 2021.
Colorado Castellary, Arturo. Éxodo y Exilio Del Arte: La Odisea Del Museo Del Prado Durante La Guerra Civil. Madrid: Cátedra, 2008.
España, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes y Memoria Democrática, Ley del Patrimonio Histórico Español, BOE, 155, 19/07/1985, https://www.boe.es/ eli/es/l/1985/06/25/16/con
Babío Urkidi, Carlos, and Manuel Pérez Lorenzo. Meirás: Un Pazo, Un Caudillo, Un Espolio. Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain: Fundación Galiza Sempre, 2018.
Barreira, David. "Las Tretas Del Franquismo Con El Patrimonio: Expolió y Entregó 8.000 Obras a Instituciones y Amigos.” El Español. El Español, February 20, 2021. https:// www.elespanol.com/cultura/historia/20210220/tretas-franquismo-patrimonio-expolio-entrego-instituciones-amigos/560195184_0.html
Gassiot Ballbé, Ermengol. "Arqueología De Un Silencio. Arqueología Forense De La Guerra Civil y Del Franquismo.” Complutum 19, no. 2 (December 29, 2008): 119–30. https:// revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CMPL/article/view/CMPL0808220119A
RTVE Noticias, "El PAZO DE MEIRÁS ya está en manos del Estado, tras ser devuelto por los herederos de FRANCO”, YouTube, 10 December 2020, 4:29, https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=S5san1B0rUQ
Viñas, Ángel. En El Combate Por La Historia: La República, La Guerra Civil, El Franquismo. Barcelona, España: Pasado & Presente, 2020.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Alted Vigil, Alicia. Política Del Nuevo Estado Sobre El Patrimonio Cultural y La Educación Durante La Guerra Civil Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, Centro Nacional de Información Artística, Arqueológica y Etnológica, 1984.
Álvarez Lopera, José. La Política De Bienes Culturales Del Gobierno Republicano Durante La Guerra Civil Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte, 1982.
Colorado Castellary, Arturo. Arte, Botín De Guerra. Madrid: Ed. Cátedra, 2021.
Colorado Castellary, Arturo. Éxodo y Exilio Del Arte: La Odisea Del Museo Del Prado Durante La Guerra Civil. Madrid: Cátedra, 2008.
España, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes y Memoria Democrática, Ley del Patrimonio Histórico Español, BOE, 155, 19/07/1985, https://www.boe.es/ eli/es/l/1985/06/25/16/con
Babío Urkidi, Carlos, and Manuel Pérez Lorenzo. Meirás: Un Pazo, Un Caudillo, Un Espolio. Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain: Fundación Galiza Sempre, 2018.
Barreira, David. "Las Tretas Del Franquismo Con El Patrimonio: Expolió y Entregó 8.000 Obras a Instituciones y Amigos.” El Español. El Español, February 20, 2021. https:// www.elespanol.com/cultura/historia/20210220/tretas-franquismo-patrimonio-expolio-entrego-instituciones-amigos/560195184_0.html
Gassiot Ballbé, Ermengol. "Arqueología De Un Silencio. Arqueología Forense De La Guerra Civil y Del Franquismo.” Complutum 19, no. 2 (December 29, 2008): 119–30. https:// revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CMPL/article/view/CMPL0808220119A
RTVE Noticias, "El PAZO DE MEIRÁS ya está en manos del Estado, tras ser devuelto por los herederos de FRANCO”, YouTube, 10 December 2020, 4:29, https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=S5san1B0rUQ
Viñas, Ángel. En El Combate Por La Historia: La República, La Guerra Civil, El Franquismo. Barcelona, España: Pasado & Presente, 2020.