Bakalářská práce se zaměřuje na saúdsko-íránské soupeření v rámci katarského arabského jara z pohledu teorie rolí. Cílem je aplikovat teorii rolí na případy Saúdské Arábie a Íránu před a po arabském jaru v Kataru na základě oficiálních vyjádření představitelů těchto zemí. Mezi další oblasti výzkumu patří zachycení změn v projevech rolí a určení dopadu změn rolí po katarském arabském jaru na rivalitu mezi Rijádem a Teheránem. Na základě analýzy jsou identifikovány změny některých rolí Saúdské Arábie po arabském jaru v Kataru, zejména role garanta stability. Na druhou stranu jsou role Íránu po katarském arabském jaru charakterizovány jako do značné míry nezměněné.
Anotace v angličtině
The Bachelor's thesis focuses on the Saudi-Iranian rivalry in the Qatar Arab Spring from the perspective of role theory. The aim is to apply role theory to the cases of Saudi Arabia and Iran before and after the Arab Spring in Qatar based on the official statements of the leaders of these countries. Other areas of research include capturing changes in role performance and determining the impact of role changes after the Qatar Arab Spring on the rivalry between Riyadh and Tehran. Based on the analysis, some of Saudi Arabia's roles are identified as changed after the Arab Spring in Qatar, particularly the role of guarantor of stability. On the other hand, Iran's roles are characterized as largely unchanged after the Qatari Arab Spring.
Klíčová slova
Saúdská Arábie, Írán, Katar, teorie rolí, arabské jaro, rivalita
Klíčová slova v angličtině
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Qatar, role theory, Arab Spring, rivalry
Rozsah průvodní práce
57 s. (101 200 znaků)
Jazyk
AN
Anotace
Bakalářská práce se zaměřuje na saúdsko-íránské soupeření v rámci katarského arabského jara z pohledu teorie rolí. Cílem je aplikovat teorii rolí na případy Saúdské Arábie a Íránu před a po arabském jaru v Kataru na základě oficiálních vyjádření představitelů těchto zemí. Mezi další oblasti výzkumu patří zachycení změn v projevech rolí a určení dopadu změn rolí po katarském arabském jaru na rivalitu mezi Rijádem a Teheránem. Na základě analýzy jsou identifikovány změny některých rolí Saúdské Arábie po arabském jaru v Kataru, zejména role garanta stability. Na druhou stranu jsou role Íránu po katarském arabském jaru charakterizovány jako do značné míry nezměněné.
Anotace v angličtině
The Bachelor's thesis focuses on the Saudi-Iranian rivalry in the Qatar Arab Spring from the perspective of role theory. The aim is to apply role theory to the cases of Saudi Arabia and Iran before and after the Arab Spring in Qatar based on the official statements of the leaders of these countries. Other areas of research include capturing changes in role performance and determining the impact of role changes after the Qatar Arab Spring on the rivalry between Riyadh and Tehran. Based on the analysis, some of Saudi Arabia's roles are identified as changed after the Arab Spring in Qatar, particularly the role of guarantor of stability. On the other hand, Iran's roles are characterized as largely unchanged after the Qatari Arab Spring.
Klíčová slova
Saúdská Arábie, Írán, Katar, teorie rolí, arabské jaro, rivalita
Klíčová slova v angličtině
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Qatar, role theory, Arab Spring, rivalry
Zásady pro vypracování
Mutual relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran before and after Arab Spring
Most important factors affecting relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran
Qatar’s Arab Spring and it’s specificity
Saudi and Irani reactions to the Arab Spring in Qatar
Saudi-Iranian rivalry before, during and after Arab Spring in Qatar
Role theory and it’s application to Saudi-Iranian rivalry in Qatar
Bachelor thesis is focused on rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the two regional powers competing for dominance in the Gulf. Main objective of the thesis is to understand the rivalry by using the Role theory. Role theory deals with the national role conceptions projected outwards by the countries. This theory assumes that Iran and Saudi Arabia project their identification markers outwards, which are created by policymakers to portray national values, beliefs and ideologies. For example, Iran presents its role as a bulwark of revolutions, whereas Saudi Arabia sets its strong anti-instability role. Qatar was chosen because of its unique scheme of Arab Spring, which is closely examined, and because of its specific relation to Saudi Arabia in the context of Gulf countries. Principal focus of thesis are Saudi and Iranian reactions to Arab Spring in Qatar and detecting, whether the rivalry is somehow present in their international behaviour. In summary, thesis aims to contribute to better understanding of Saudi and Iranian projection of themselves outwards and of the affection of rivalry to region’s politics.
Zásady pro vypracování
Mutual relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran before and after Arab Spring
Most important factors affecting relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran
Qatar’s Arab Spring and it’s specificity
Saudi and Irani reactions to the Arab Spring in Qatar
Saudi-Iranian rivalry before, during and after Arab Spring in Qatar
Role theory and it’s application to Saudi-Iranian rivalry in Qatar
Bachelor thesis is focused on rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the two regional powers competing for dominance in the Gulf. Main objective of the thesis is to understand the rivalry by using the Role theory. Role theory deals with the national role conceptions projected outwards by the countries. This theory assumes that Iran and Saudi Arabia project their identification markers outwards, which are created by policymakers to portray national values, beliefs and ideologies. For example, Iran presents its role as a bulwark of revolutions, whereas Saudi Arabia sets its strong anti-instability role. Qatar was chosen because of its unique scheme of Arab Spring, which is closely examined, and because of its specific relation to Saudi Arabia in the context of Gulf countries. Principal focus of thesis are Saudi and Iranian reactions to Arab Spring in Qatar and detecting, whether the rivalry is somehow present in their international behaviour. In summary, thesis aims to contribute to better understanding of Saudi and Iranian projection of themselves outwards and of the affection of rivalry to region’s politics.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Sadiki, L. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge Handbook of the Arab Spring: Rethinking Democratization. Routledge.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2014, 24th September). QATAR AND THE ARAB SPRING: Policy Drivers and Regional Implications. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from https://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/24/qatar-and-arab-spring-policy-drivers-and-regional-implications-pub-56723
Bilgin, A. R. (2018). Relations Between Qatar and Saudi Arabia After the Arab Spring. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 11(3), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2018.113006
Gimenez Cerioli, L. (2018). Roles and International Behaviour: Saudi–Iranian Rivalry in Bahrain’s and Yemen’s Arab Spring. SciELO Brazil, 40(02). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2018400200010
Hameed, U. (2017). The Saudi-Iranian Rivalry: A Foreign Policy Analysis Approach. Towson University Journal of International Affairs, L(2), 16-34.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2014). Qatar and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
Nuruzzaman, M. N. (2015). Qatar and the Arab Spring: down the foreign policy slope. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 8(2), 226-238.
Ehteshami, A., Quilliam, N., & Bahgat, G. (Eds.). (2017). Security and Bilateral Issues between Iran and its Arab Neighbours. Palgrave Macmillan.
Holsti, K. J. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233-309.
Harnisch, S., Frank, C., & Maull, H. W. (Eds.). (2011). Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and analyses. Routledge.
Grumet, T. R. (2015). NEW MIDDLE EAST COLD WAR: SAUDI ARABIA AND IRAN’S RIVALRY [Thesis]. University of Denver.
Mohammed, A. A., & Moorthy, R. (2019). SAUDI-IRAN RIVALRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST: IMPLICATION TO NATIONAL SECURITY. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(1), 1-13.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2012). Small States with a Big Role: Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in the Wake of the Arab Spring [Discussion Paper]. Durham University.
Simon, M. (2015). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Power and Rivalry in the Middle East. I.B. Tauris.
Wehrey, F. et al. (2009). Saudi-Iranian Relations Since the Fall of Saddam: Rivalry, Cooperation, and Implications for U.S. Policy. RAND Corporation.
Bin Huwaidin, M. (2015). The Security Dilemma in Saudi-Iranian Relations. Review of History and Political Science, 3(2), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.15640/rhps.v3n2a8
Amiri, R. E. (2011). Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait as Turning Point in Iran-Saudi Relationship. Journal of Politics and Law, 4(1), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v4n1p188
Cordesman, A. H., & Harrington, N. (2018). The Arab Gulf States and Iran: Military Spending, Modernization, and the Shifting Military Balance. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Sadiki, L. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge Handbook of the Arab Spring: Rethinking Democratization. Routledge.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2014, 24th September). QATAR AND THE ARAB SPRING: Policy Drivers and Regional Implications. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from https://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/24/qatar-and-arab-spring-policy-drivers-and-regional-implications-pub-56723
Bilgin, A. R. (2018). Relations Between Qatar and Saudi Arabia After the Arab Spring. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 11(3), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2018.113006
Gimenez Cerioli, L. (2018). Roles and International Behaviour: Saudi–Iranian Rivalry in Bahrain’s and Yemen’s Arab Spring. SciELO Brazil, 40(02). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2018400200010
Hameed, U. (2017). The Saudi-Iranian Rivalry: A Foreign Policy Analysis Approach. Towson University Journal of International Affairs, L(2), 16-34.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2014). Qatar and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
Nuruzzaman, M. N. (2015). Qatar and the Arab Spring: down the foreign policy slope. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 8(2), 226-238.
Ehteshami, A., Quilliam, N., & Bahgat, G. (Eds.). (2017). Security and Bilateral Issues between Iran and its Arab Neighbours. Palgrave Macmillan.
Holsti, K. J. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233-309.
Harnisch, S., Frank, C., & Maull, H. W. (Eds.). (2011). Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and analyses. Routledge.
Grumet, T. R. (2015). NEW MIDDLE EAST COLD WAR: SAUDI ARABIA AND IRAN’S RIVALRY [Thesis]. University of Denver.
Mohammed, A. A., & Moorthy, R. (2019). SAUDI-IRAN RIVALRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST: IMPLICATION TO NATIONAL SECURITY. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(1), 1-13.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2012). Small States with a Big Role: Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in the Wake of the Arab Spring [Discussion Paper]. Durham University.
Simon, M. (2015). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Power and Rivalry in the Middle East. I.B. Tauris.
Wehrey, F. et al. (2009). Saudi-Iranian Relations Since the Fall of Saddam: Rivalry, Cooperation, and Implications for U.S. Policy. RAND Corporation.
Bin Huwaidin, M. (2015). The Security Dilemma in Saudi-Iranian Relations. Review of History and Political Science, 3(2), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.15640/rhps.v3n2a8
Amiri, R. E. (2011). Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait as Turning Point in Iran-Saudi Relationship. Journal of Politics and Law, 4(1), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v4n1p188
Cordesman, A. H., & Harrington, N. (2018). The Arab Gulf States and Iran: Military Spending, Modernization, and the Shifting Military Balance. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Přílohy volně vložené
-
Přílohy vázané v práci
tabulky
Převzato z knihovny
Ne
Plný text práce
Přílohy
Posudek(y) oponenta
Hodnocení vedoucího
Záznam průběhu obhajoby
Student na úvod obhajoby představil komisi základní východiska, cíle a závěry své práce. Autorovi byly následně přečteny posudky a M. Čeřovský jejich závěry přijal. K práci nebyly vzneseny vážnější výtky; týkaly se např. většího množství složitých výzkumných otázek nebo slabší metodologie a reflexe literatury. Student se poměrně přesvědčivě obhajoval a průběžně reagoval na doplňující otázky komise. Obhajoba proběhla úspěšně.
Práce prošla kontrolou v systému Theses a nejedná se o plagiát.