|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Bureš Pavel, JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Faix Martin, JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Svaček Ondřej, doc. JUDr. LL.M. Ph.D.
-
Jílek Dalibor, prof. JUDr. CSc.
|
|
Course content
|
1) Relationship between public international law and national legal systems (with emphasis on the idea of pluralism) 2) Public international law as part of the European law (process of internationalisation of the European law and the process of europeanisation of international law) 3) Public international law and international relations and politics 4) Public international law and morals and ethics
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Monologic Lecture(Interpretation, Training)
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The course deepens knowledge of the field of public international law. It puts emphasis on explaining the relationship of public international law with other disciplines, legal or non-legal. Classes will have form of interactive lectures with small group of students in the format: reading preparation - lecture - problem identification - discussion. The aim of the course is to introduce to students the linkages between the fields of public international law, national legal systems, legal system of the EU, politics (international relations) and moral.
to introduce to students the linkages between the fields of public international law, national legal systems, legal system of the EU, politics (international relations) and moral.
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Completion of the course is conditional upon completion of Advanced International Law I., II.
MEP/AIL1 and MEP/AIL2
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance
80% attendance at lectures. Students enrolled in the combined form are required to attend at least 30% of lectures and one consultation with the lecturer. Information on the combined form: Students meet with the lecturer during direct lectures (at least 30% of lectures) and at least one personal consultation, during which students are required to discuss the knowledge gained through self-study of publications assigned by the lecturer. Students are also entitled to consult with the teacher via email correspondence, provided that the nature of the question is suitable for this form of communication.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
BUCHANAN, A. (2003). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law.. Oxford.
-
CANNIZZARO, E. et al. (2011). International Law as Law of the European Union. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
-
CAPPS, P. (2017). Ethical Rationalism and the Law. Hart.
-
GOVAERE, I. (2018). The Interface between EU and International Law. Hart.
-
KLABBERS, J. (2013). Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance. Cambridge.
-
KOSKENNIEMI, M. (2011). The Politics of International Law. Hart.
-
ORFORD, A. (2009). International Law and Its Others. Cambridge.
-
POSNER, E., GOLDSMITH, J. (2006). Limits of International Law. Oxford.
-
WOUTERS, J., NOLLKAEMPER, A., DE WET, E. (2008). The Europeanisation of International Law: The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States.. The Hague: Asser Press.
|