|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Razim Jakub, JUDr. PhDr. Ph.D. et Ph.D.
-
Horák Ondřej, doc. JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Dostalík Petr, doc. JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Osina Petr, JUDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
How to grasp the conclusion and overall completion of the dissertation. The appropriateness and necessity of reducing the text or the need to change the scope of individual parts of the thesis. Emphasis on the originality and contribution of the thesis.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Work with Text (with Book, Textbook)
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The course is a basic subject forming the third pillar of the study programme, focusing on the development of professional skills and general competences of the student, specifically on the student's ability to present the acquired knowledge and skills in a scientific text and in a professional scientific forum. The course is designed as a four-semester course, with the demands of student performance in the course increasing as the semesters progress. The course builds primarily on the philosophical-methodological foundations of law and scientific propedeutics and is designed for students of Legal History and Roman Law programme. During the semester, as in the second and third semesters of the course, the student is obliged to choose a topic for his/her scientific paper in cooperation with his/her supervisor (identify the problem to be solved) and to prepare the scientific paper in such a way that it is eligible for presentation at a scientific conference (ability to present the solution to the chosen problem). Active participation in the conference includes the written preparation of the paper and its publication in the conference proceedings or other conference output. In the event that the conference proceedings are not prepared, this obligation may exceptionally be waived in agreement with the supervisor. At this stage of the study, the student must have already completed the core part of his/her dissertation. Therefore, in order to successfully complete the course, the student is required to submit to his/her supervisor a complete dissertation passage of at least 50 pages of text.
The student's ability to present the acquired knowledge and skills in a scientific text and at a professional scientific forum.
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Completion of this course is conditional upon completion of the courses Philosophical-Methodological Foundations of Law I., II., Scientific and Pedagogical Propedeutics I., II. and Scientific Activity and Dissertation Preparation in the Field of Legal History and Roman Law I.-IV.
KTP/RFMZ2 and KPO/RVPP1 and KPO/RVPP2 and KTP/RVCR1 and KTP/RVCR2 and KTP/RVCR3 and KTP/RFMZ1
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance
Course requirements are the active participation in a scientific conference and submission of a complete dissertation of at least 50 pages. The conditions are the same for students of the combined form of study.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Appleby Joyce, Lynn Hunt a Margaret Jacob. (2002). Jak říkat pravdu o dějinách: historie, věda, historie jako věda a Spojené státy americké. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
-
Berger S., Feldner H., Passmore K. (eds.). (2016). Jak se píšou dějiny: teorie a praxe. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
-
BLOCH, Marc. (2011). Obrana historie aneb historik a jeho řemeslo. Praha: Argo.
-
Carr, Edward Hallett. (1967). Co je historie?. Praha: Svoboda.
-
časopis Dějiny - teorie - kritika. časopis Dějiny - teorie - kritika.
-
Del Mar M., Lobban M. (2014). Legal Theory and Legal History. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, England.
-
Himl, Pavel, Jan Tuček a kol. (2015). Texty k historickému prosemináři FHS UK.
-
Horský, Jan. (2009). Dějepisectví mezi vědou a vyprěvěním: úvahy o povaze, postupech a mezích historické vědy.. Praha: Argo.
-
Kutnar František, Jaroslav Marek. (2009). Přehledné dějiny českého a slovenského dějepisectví. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
-
Miroslav Hroch a kol. (1985). Úvod do studia dějepisu. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
-
Morétau O., Mansferrer A., Modéer K. A. (2020). Comparative Legal History. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing Ltd.
-
Musson A., Stebbings Ch. (2012). Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Parker L. D., Graves O. F. (2015). Methodology and Method in History: A Bibliography. London: Routledge.
-
Pešek, Jiří (ed.). (2000). VIII. Sjezd českých historiků. Hradec Králové 10.-12. září 1999. Praha: Scriptorium.
-
Třeštík, Dušan. (1999). Mysliti dějiny. Praha: Paseka.
|