Course: Law of the EU's External Relations 2

« Back
Course title Law of the EU's External Relations 2
Course code MEP/PVEU2
Organizational form of instruction Seminar
Level of course Master
Year of study not specified
Semester Summer
Number of ECTS credits 5
Language of instruction Czech
Status of course Compulsory
Form of instruction Face-to-face
Work placements This is not an internship
Recommended optional programme components None
Lecturer(s)
  • Stehlík Václav, doc. JUDr. LL.M., Ph.D.
  • Filipec Ondřej, Mgr. et Mgr. Ph.D.
Course content
1. Institutional, legal and political development of EU foreign and security policy I 2. Institutional, legal and political development of EU foreign and security policy II 3. Institutional, legal and political development of EU foreign and security policy III 4. Legal, political and security aspects of EU military and civilian missions 5. The relationship between the EU and NATO, the UN 6. The relationship between the EU and the USA, Canada and Latin America 7. EU-Russia relationship, Eastern Partnership, and Black Sea Synergies 8. Policy and legal aspects of Mediterranean cooperation 9. EU-China, India, Japan and South Korea relations 10. Relations between the EU and candidate countries with emphasis on Turkey 11. Legal and political aspects of the fight against terrorism, sea piracy and the spread of WMD 12. Selected aspects of migration policy in the context of the external dimension of the EU

Learning activities and teaching methods
Monologic Lecture(Interpretation, Training)
Learning outcomes
The course External Relations Law II aims to acquaint students with the institutional and legal bases of the external dimension of the EU. The graduate will gain an overview of the historical development of legal, political and security aspects of cooperation in the mainstream of European integration, get acquainted with the legal and political mechanisms of the EU institutions in the field of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy, including relations with various groups of countries or international organizations. The course is characterized by a multidisciplinary concept, which assumes the involvement of various teachers of the Faculty of Law to address specific topics that by their nature go beyond the law, security and international relations, political science, or economics. The course also offers the use of expertise and specialization of law school staff in terms of EU relations with selected regions (e.g. USA, Latin America, Turkey). External law course II. is primarily focused on the content of the legal and political agenda of the EU in relation to selected international organizations (UN, NATO, WTO?), countries, and groups of countries in the historical context and current context associated with the post-Lisbon order. The course is taught by the seminar method, which allows interactive and more intensive work with students, as well as the lecture method with the involvement of the guarantor
After completing the course, the student will be familiar with the external dimension of the EU in terms of institutional and legal mechanisms. They will also learn about the content of common policies, which have a strong external dimension and can be taken as part of EU foreign policy. The student will be able to think critically about the setting of EU mechanisms and policies and be aware of the importance and role of law in external relations.
Prerequisites
Completion of this subjekt is not conditional upon compection of another subjekt.

Assessment methods and criteria
Student performance, Seminar Work, Written exam

Students will have a written test at the end of the course on the material covered in lectures and seminars and compulsory reading.
Recommended literature
  • Council Decision of 1 December 2009 adopting the Council's Rules of Procedure (2009/937/EU)..
  • Adler, Emanuel a Crawford, Beverly. (2004). Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP). Institute of European Studies, Berkeley.
  • Balducci, Giuseppe. (2010). The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China. East Asia: An International Quarterly, 27, 1, s. 35-55..
  • Bidedermann, Max. (2014). Ukraine: Between Scylla and Charybdis. North Carolina Journal of International Law &Commercial Regulation. Fall 2014, 40, 1, s. 219-244.
  • Carbone, Maurizio. (2013). Rethinking ACP-EU Relations After Cotonou: Tensions, Contradictions, Prospects. Journal of International Development, 25, 5, s. 742-756.
  • Crowe, Brian. (2003). A common European foreign policy after Iraq? International Affairs, 79, 3, s. 533-546..
  • Deightson, Anne. (2002). The European Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 4, s. 719-741,.
  • Dias, Vanda Amaro. (2013). The EU and Russia. Competing Discourses, Practices and Iterests in the Shared Neighbourhood.. Perspectives on European Politics & Society, 14, 2, s. 256-271.
  • Faber, Gerrit a Orbie, Jan. (2009). Everything But Arms: Much More than Appears at First Sight.. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47, 4, s. 767-787.
  • Gomes, Patrick I. (2013). Reshaping an Asymetrical Partnership: ACP-EU Relations from an ACP Perspective. Journal of International Develpoment, 25, 5, s. 714-726.
  • Gulyaeva, Olga. (2013). Russian Vision of the EU in its Interactions with the Neighbourhood. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 3, 3, s. 175-194.
  • Hill, Christopher. (2004). Renationalizing or Regrouping? EU Foreign Policy Since 11 Sptember 2001. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 1, s. 143-163.
  • Karásek, Tomáš. (2007). Integrace nebo mocenská rovnováha? Konceptualizace "vysoké" a "nízké" zahraničně-bezpečnostní politiky v rámci Evropské unie. Mezinárodní vztahy 2, 2007, s. 5-29..
  • Kaunert, Christian, Léonard, Sarah a MacKenzie Alex. (2012). The social construction of an EU interest in counter-terrorism: US influence and internal struggles in the cases of PNR and SWIFT.. European Security, 21, 4, s. 474-496.
  • Keohane, Daniel. (2008). The Absent Friend: EU Foreign Policy and Counter-Terrorism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 1, s. 125-146.
  • Lehne, Stefan. (2012). The Big Three in EU Foregin Policy. The Carnegie Papers, July 2012.
  • Lucarelli, Sonia a Manners, Ian. (2006). Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. New York: Routledge.
  • Men, Jing. (2012). The EU and China: mismatched partners?. Journal of Contemporary China, 21, 74, s. 333-349.
  • Metea, Ileana-Gentilia. (2014). NATO and EU Operations Reflected in the New Strategic Concpet of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.. Buletin Stiintific, 19, 1, s. 45-49.
  • Ojanen, Hanna. (2006). The EU and NATO: Two Competing Models for a Common Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 1, s. 57-76.
  • Pape, Elisabeth. (2013). An Old Parnership in a New Setting: ACP-EU Relations from a Euroepan Perspective. Journal of International Development, 25, 5, s. 727-741.
  • Pasatoiu, Florin. (2014). From Obsolete Normative to Realpolitik in the EU and Russia Foreign Policy Relations. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 14, 4, s. 5-35.
  • Plummer, Michael G. (2014). Asian Integration and Its Implications for the EU "Post-Doha". Asian Economic Papers, 13, 1, s. 53-79.
  • Pricopi, Marius. (2013). The Importance of the Transatlantic Link for the European Defence integration Process. Revista Academiei Fortelor Terestre, 18, 4, 347-353, s. 347-353.
  • Rasmussen, Steffen Bay. (2014). EU Diplomacy After Lisbon: Institutional Innovation, Diplomatic Practices and International Strategy, s. 778-801..
  • Shaun, Beslin. (2010). The EU and Asia Within an Evolving Global Order: What is Europe? Where is Asia?. East Asia: An International Quarterly, 27, 1, s. 1-13.
  • Simon, Luis. (2010). Command and control? Planning for EU military operations. Occasional Paper 81, January 2010.
  • Smith, Ross Nicholas. (2014). The EU's Difficulty in Translating Interests into Effective Foreign Policy Action: A Look at the Ukraine Crisis. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 4, 1, s. 54-68.
  • Snyder, Timothy. (2019). Cesta k nesvobodě. Rusko, Evropa, Amrika.. Praha: Prostor.
  • Snyder, Timothy. (2014). Putinův projekt. Ukrajina mezi Evropou a Eurasií. ECHO24.cz, 24. dubna 2014.
  • Stokes, Doug a Whitman, Richard G. (2013). Transatlantic triage? European and UK "Grand Straegy" after the US rebalance to Asia.. International Affairs, 89, 5, s. 1087-1107.
  • Yuichi, Hosoya. (2012). The evolution of the EU-Japan relationship: towards a "normative partnership"? Japan Forum, 24, 3, s. 317-337.. Japan Forum, 24, 3, s. 317-337.
  • Zhimin, Chen. (2012). Europe as a Global Player: A View from China. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs, 20, 2, s. 7-29.. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs, 20, 2, s. 7-29.


Study plans that include the course
Faculty Study plan (Version) Category of Branch/Specialization Recommended year of study Recommended semester
Faculty: Faculty of Law Study plan (Version): European Law and EU Policies (EPAPEU2022) Category: Law, legal and public administration proceeding 2 Recommended year of study:2, Recommended semester: Summer