|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Menke Monika, ThLic. Mgr. Th.D.
-
Dostalík Petr, doc. JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Razim Jakub, JUDr. PhDr. Ph.D. et Ph.D.
-
Bubelová Kamila, JUDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
1. Roman jurists and the Roman state: the power trade-off between state power and jurisprudence from Augustus to Hadrian 1.1. Archaic law: the relationship between law and religion. The basic features of Roman legal thought 1.2. The Roman jurist: from private arbiter to servant of the state 1.3. Scaevola, Labeo, Ulpian 2. The influence of Greek philosophy on Roman law and the further development of the doctrines of state law 2.1. Polybios and the changes in the constitutions 2.2. The mixed constitution 2.3. Natural law 2.4. Aristotle: conception of justice and virtue ethics 3. Private law reception 3.1. The fate of Roman law after the end of the Western Roman Empire 3.2. The relationship between Christianity and law 3.3. The common law of universities 3.4. Medieval schools of Roman law 3.5. Natural Law School 3.6. Usus modernus pandectarum, German science, positivism, codification.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Dialogic Lecture (Discussion, Dialog, Brainstorming)
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The course represents the basic subject of the second pillar of the study programme aimed primarily at developing and deepening the student's knowledge in the the of Legal History and Roman Law programme. The essence of the course will be the analysis of the theoretical and practical issues of Roman law. Each seminar will have its own topic within which students will prepare their own presentation or analysis of a specific legal problem. Topics will be presented in the seminar and then discussed with other students and the teachers involved. The course is designed as a two-semester course, with emphasis on selected issues in Roman law each semester. The first semester focuses primarily on a deeper understanding of the general part of Roman law beyond the Master's degree. The second semester will then focus on specific issues of Roman law, particularly with regard to the topics of the students' dissertations.
A deeper understanding of Roman law and its key themes.
|
|
Prerequisites
|
CPrerequisites - other information about course preconditions: Completion of this course is conditional upon the completion of the courses Philosophical and methodological foundations of law I., II. and Scientific and pedagogical propedeutics I., II.
KPO/RVPP1 and KPO/RVPP2 and KTP/RFMZ1
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance
Active participation in seminars, including presentations on the assigned topic. A full-time student must attend 80% of the seminars. A student of the combined form must attend at least 30% of the seminars and individual consultations of two hours. A professional interview over a written document prepared by the student.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Bartošek, M. (1994). Encyklopedie římského práva. Academia Praha.
-
Bartošek, M. (1993). Škola právnického myšlení. Praha.
-
Boháček, Miroslav. (1975). Einflüsse des römischen Rechts in Böhmen und Mähren. Milano: Giuffre.
-
Cairns, John W, Paul J. Plessis (ed.). (2013). The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-
Coing, Helmut. (1985). Europa?isches Privatrecht 1. A?lteres gemeines Recht (1500 bis 1800). Mu?nchen: C.H. Beck.
-
Coing, Helmut. (1989). Europäisches Privatrecht 2. 19. Jahrhundert (1800 bis 1914). München: C.H.Beck.
-
Coing, Helmut. (1973). Handbuch der Quellen und Literatur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte 1. Mittelalter (1100-1500). München : C.H. Beck.
-
ČERNÝ, M. (2014). Středověcí glosátoři - nejdůležitější představitelé a metoda jejich práce. Acta Iuridica Olomucensia.
-
DAJCZAK, W., GIARO T., LONGCHAMPS DE BÉRIER, DOSTALÍK, P. (2014). Právo římské. Základy soukromého práva. Olomouc: Iuridicum Olomucense.
-
DOSTALÍK, P. (2018). Condictiones. Ke kořenům bezdůvodného obohacení. Praha: Auditorium.
-
DOSTALÍK, P. (2013). Opuštění zásady mala fides superveniens non nocet jako příklad vlivu kanonického práva na ABGB. In: Melior est aquisitio scientiae negotiatione argenti. In: Pocta prof. Ignácovi Antonínovi Hrdinovi, O. Praem. k šedesátým narozeninám (eds. E., G. Šidlovský; V. Valeš; J. Polesný).
-
DOSTALÍK, P. (2020). Příkazní smlouva a jednatelství bez příkazu. Plzeň: ZČU.
-
Dostalík, P. (2014). Relativní majetková práva z historicko-srovnávací perspektivy. Olomouc.
-
Lange, Hermann, Maximiliane Kriechbaum. (2007). Ro?misches Recht im Mittelalter 2. Die Kommentatoren. Mu?nchen: C.H. Beck.
-
Lange, Hermann. (1997). Ro?misches Recht im Mittelalter 1. Die Glossatoren. Mu?nchen : C.H. Beck.
-
Ott, Emil. (1879). Beiträge zur Receptions-Geschichte des rőmisch-canonischen Processes in den bőhmischen Ländern. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
-
Schrage, Eltjo J. H, Erich Genzmer. (1987). Das Ro?mische Recht Im Mittelalter. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
-
Schrage, Eltjo J. H. Utrumque Ius. (2017). Eine Einfu?hrung in das Studium der Quellen des mittelalterlichen gelehrten Rechts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH.
-
Urfus, Valentin. (1994). Historické základy novodobého práva soukromého: římskoprávní dědictví a soukromé právo kontinentální Evropy. Praha: C.H. Beck.
-
Varcl, Ladislav a kol. (1978). Antika a česká kultura. Praha: Academia.
|