|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Konečný Karel, doc. PhDr. CSc.
-
Hampl David, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Tungul Lucie, Mgr. Ph.D., M.A.
-
Kopeček Pavel, PhDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
Comparative analysis system. Presidential systems. Semipresidential systems. Parliamentary systems. Transitions to democracy. Non-democratic systems. The political system of the country.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
Monologic Lecture(Interpretation, Training), Dialogic Lecture (Discussion, Dialog, Brainstorming)
- Attendace
- 10 hours per semester
- Homework for Teaching
- 18 hours per semester
- Semestral Work
- 20 hours per semester
- Preparation for the Course Credit
- 20 hours per semester
- Preparation for the Exam
- 40 hours per semester
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The lectures are devoted to the issue of comparison of political systems. After a theoretical introduction will be followed by an analysis of systems of presidential, parliamentary and semi-presidential. Characteristics of basic individual characters systems will be supplemented by examples of specific national political systems. Attention will be paid to the issue of transition to democracy, which is necessary for understanding the process of building democracy eg. In the former Soviet sphere of influence. Party Furthermore, it will undemocratic systems, especially contemporary forms of totalitarian and authoritarian systems. Seminars are devoted to the issue of political systems based on studies of primary and secondary literature. After completing the course, students should be able to: "Defining political systems "Clarify the differences between the presidential, parliamentary and poloprezidentskými "Characterize totalitarian and authoritarian regimes "Explain the issues transitology
"Defining political systems "Clarify the differences between the presidential, parliamentary and poloprezidentskými "Characterize totalitarian and authoritarian regimes "Explain the issues transitology
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Orientation in the field of political systems.
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Oral exam, Seminar Work
Self-assigned study materials (literature) in the range of 18 hours. The condition for granting credit is drafting essay on an assigned topic. Orientation problems will be verified by means testing.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Aristotelés. (1988). Politika.. Bratislava: Pravda.
-
Balík, S., Kubát, M. (2004). Teorie a praxe totalitních a autoritativních režimů. Dokořán, Praha.
-
Cabada, L., Dvořáková, V. a kol. (2000). Komparace politických systémů III.. Praha: VŠE.
-
Čermák, V. (1992). Otázka demokracie 1. Demokracie a totalitarismus.. Praha: Academia.
-
Dvořáková, V. a kol. (2003). Komparace politických systémů 1.. Praha: VŠE.
-
Dvořáková, V., Kunc, J. (1994). O přechodech k demokracii.. Praha: SLON.
-
Dvořáková, V. (2002). Spojené státy americké: společnost a politika.. Praha: Libri.
-
Holzer, J., Balík, S. (2007). Postkomunistické nedemokratické režimy.. Brno: CDK.
-
Klíma, M. (2001). Kvalita demokracie v České republice a volební inženýrství. Praha: RADIX.
-
Klíma, M. (1998). Volby a politické strany v moderních demokraciích.. Praha: RADIX.
-
Klokočka, V. (1991). Politická reprezentace a volby v demokratických systémech.. Praha: Aleko.
-
Klokočka, V. (1996). Ústavní systémy evropských států.. Praha: Linde.
-
Kubát, M. a kol. (2004). Politické a ústavní systémy zemí středovýchodní Evropy.. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.
-
Novák, M. (1997). Systémy politických stran.. Praha: SLON.
-
Říchová, B. a kol. (2002). Komparace politických systémů II.. Praha: VŠE.
-
Strmiska, M. (1998). Regionální strany a stranické systémy.. Brno: CDK.
-
Tocqueville, A. (2000). Demokracie v Americe.. Praha: Academia.
-
Zakaria, F. (2005). Budoucnost svobody.. Praha: Academia.
|